TPRC 2024: The 52nd Research Conference on Communications, Information and Inter

This panel compares and contrasts how regulatory agencies and approaches are emerging in different regions to address digital challenges and opportunities. The audience will learn whether and how nations decide to address problems with current resources, reform existing regulatory agencies, create new ones, or leave the problems alone. The panelists are leading authors and regulators who will describe the dynamic landscape of digital technologies, their impact on various sectors, and the role of a digital regulatory agencies for these areas. They will discuss the challenges that digital regulatory agencies face--promoting innovation and consumer protection, managing data privacy and security, and balancing free speech and misinformation. The panel will cover a wide range of topics related to a government agency’s role and responsibilities in overseeing the digital landscape. Speakers present international perspectives on how digital regulatory agencies are emerging in US, EU, Asia, Latin America and Africa.

The Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) Program in the U.S. has directed $42.45 billion in funding to accelerate the development and deployment of broadband infrastructure that meets specific service requirements such as minimum service speeds of 100 Mbps in the downstream and 20 Mbps in the upstream, peak hour latency below 100 ms, and network reliability of no more than 48 hours of outage time over any 365-day period. An often-overlooked element to the development of these requirements are the substantial policy implications they carry for determining preferred local access network technology options, preferred broadband service operators based upon their legacy technology positions, and the overall degree to which the nation’s households are unserved and underserved in terms of broadband access. Moreover, the performance requirements can influence, the design and evolution of the Internet architecture itself by influencing the selection or implementation of protocols and measurement metrics used by broadband network operators. To date in the U.S., Broadband Internet Access Service (BIAS) performance requirements have been developed in a number of different policy efforts such as the FCC’s annual Section 706 inquiries since the 1996 Telecom Act, part of the FCC’s universal service broadband funding programs since the National Broadband Plan (beginning with CAF Phase I and II, ACAM, and then RDOF), or adopted for broadband funding programs passed by Congress (such as Treasury’s Capital Project Fund and now the NTIA’s BEAD program).
This panel will investigate various policy concerns that arise from the lack of a consistent policy framework for defining BIAS performance requirements by addressing the following questions:

1. Prior Efforts to Characterize Performance-Related Policy Concerns.
2. How has Internet Performance Changed Over Time?
3. Increasing Importance of Latency in Internet Performance using Internet Engineering Task Force’s (IETF) Low Latency Low Loss Scalable Throughput (L4S) open standards.
4. Anticipated New Requirements from Emerging Internet Applications.
5. Putting It All Together: How Should Broadband Funding Be Linked to Internet Performance Requirements?

This panel will discuss three key policy issues. Firstly, what can be learned from past government policy decisions to purchase commercial communications services? Secondly, what should NASA’s role be in different commercial models, and what might the advantages or disadvantages of various approaches be? Finally, how should NASA optimize the benefits of having a competitive market place, versus the economies of scale benefits of bulk purchasing?
 

If previous timeframes are to be followed, the next generation cellular system, 6G, can expect to roll out around 2030 (i.e., just 6 years from today). Consequently, discussions in the 3GPP and ITU on the development of 6G standards will begin in 2024. Thus, it is timely and relevant to bring together experts who are considering the technical, economic, policy, and regulation that surround the expectations of this emerging standard. In this light, multiple questions need to be addressed to start defining the new standard from multiple perspectives. These questions include but are not limited to the following: Should 6G be 10x faster than 5G? Should it be a lower cost than other standards (e.g., 5G) to reduce the digital divide? Should it focus on programmability and customization? How should spectrum sharing be incorporated into this new standard? The panel will address these and other topics that are likely to emerge over the next several months.

Discussion topics may include the influence of emerging technologies such as open and virtual networks, artificial intelligence, machine learning, and quantum computing; security and privacy issues; and economic, market, and societal concerns and solutions.
Overall, the panel aims to generate discussion around key opportunities for successful spectrum management and wireless policy. What are important lessons learned, nationally and from other countries? What worked well, what research is needed, and how best to leverage the opportunities?